written by Colin Jenkins
NEWLY UPDATED AUGUST 28th – 2018
Training vs. Testing
Most days, we try to individualize each workout to get the best results for every member…
…that is called training.
Other days, however, we test ourselves on the same workout with as little “scaling” as possible…
…this is called testing!
This testing, also known as “Benchmark Workouts”, plays a unique and special role at Lighthouse Fitness. It is a chance to test (and later retest) your fitness. It is a chance to push yourself harder than normal. It is a chance to measure how much you’ve improved.
And while testing is fun and important to do periodically, doing Benchmarks too often can lead to stunted long-term progress, metabolic disfunction, higher injury rates, and mental burnout.
This holds truer the longer one has been training (frequent testing isn’t nearly as bad for beginners as it is for intermediate or advanced members)
The fine line of too much or too little is delicate and hard to find for each population, but it is my responsibility as the programmer for our facility to get it right.

Ensuring the frequency of benchmarks is ideal for our membership is one part of the equation. The other part is determining what exactly those benchmarks will be.
A lot of questions go into this decision:
- What do we feel are important measurements of “fitness”?
- What is most likely to give us accurate data on what we are measuring?
- What should the volume be for our population?
- Will improvement be easily seen and understood by our members?
- Should the test measure something we do frequently or something we do infrequently?
- What movements and movement standards should be used to accomplish our testing goals?
- How often should certain “aspects” of fitness be tested and retested.
- What is fun to test? Or should “fun” even factor into testing? (It factors heavily into our training)
Analyzing these questions, you can begin to understand my thought process and get a clue into why I like testing certain benchmarks over others.

Our schedule for benchmarks at Lighthouse Fitness is not set in stone. The more data we collect (on progress, injury, burnout rates, and member feedback), we will be able to dial in what is ideal for our population of members.
Currently we are choosing 2-3 benchmarks for our program every 6 weeks (not including “strength tests” or shorter “time trials”). These 2-3 benchmarks consist of:
Yearly Benchmarks
This is a benchmark we plan on re-testing around a 1 year from now. I like the idea of some benchmarks being done 1X per year as it takes the focus on training to a more long-term perspective. Who cares if you quickly make progress only to get injured or burnout within a year?!
The Yearly Benchmark we did this last month was a choice between “Jackie” and “Wacky Jackie” which consist of Rowing or Bike, Light Barbell Thrusters, and Pull-ups.
Quarterly Benchmarks
This is a benchmark we plan on retesting 3-4 months from now. This is a great way to measure short-term progress, while still being far enough apart that real progress is possible.
A Quarterly Benchmark we are doing soon is a choice between a “2K Row”, a “1 Mile Run”, or “10 Min Bike” which we tested previously back in May.
Other Benchmarks
Once a month, we will also have another benchmark that we don’t have a set-time we will be retesting it. It might be a few months, later in the year… or even much longer than a year. These tests allow us to have a little more variety in our testing and give us some good options to test our progress in the future!
——–
I hope this helps some of you get a better insight into our program, and a little bit of the “whys” as to how and when we choose to do Benchmark workouts!